Eighteen-year-old Jesse Logan had talked about attending the University of Cincinnati. Logan sent nude pictures of herself to her boyfriend by cell phone. When the pair broke up, he sent the pictures to others, and Jesse’s torment began. She was called names like slut and whore by schoolmates, and some girls even threw objects at her. Eventually Jesse started skipping classes and in July 2008, she committed suicide.
Three teen girls in Greensburg, Pennsylvania sent racy pictures of themselves to three boys at their school. The six teens have been charged with child pornography and possessing or exhibiting a picture of a child in a sexual act. These are felony charges.
According to someone who worked in a Tampa high school, a male student there received video text of a girl masturbating.
In another case at the same high school, by the end of one day, the nude picture of a female student was sent to just about everyone at the school, including faculty and staff.
Results of a survey of teens indicate that most teens send suggestive images and texts to their boyfriends and girlfriends, but many others send them to people they want to “hook up” with. Referred to as sexting—sex and texting—the majority of teens believe that sending these messages can have “serious negative consequences”. Yet, some still send them. One of the obvious negative consequences of sexting is that “sexts” may be shared with many people other than the intended recipient(s). In fact almost half of teens say doing this is “common” and admit to doing this forwarding themselves.
Why are teens sexting? Of those male and female teens who have done it, most say they are being flirtatious, and half of the girls say they are giving their boyfriends a “sexy present”. Most of the teens surveyed believe that girls are more likely than boys to send sexy videos and photos. And why would girls be more likely to sext? The majority are doing so to get or keep a guy’s attention, to get noticed, to be fun/flirtatious, or to get a guy to like them, they said.
Teens are not the only people sending racy texts, pictures and videos. In a previous post, I discussed the fact that sexy text messages were evidence of “misconduct” by Detroit’s former mayor Kwame Kilpatrick (having an extramarital affair and lying under oath) and a Tampa teacher (having sex with her students). But sexting by teens is what is claiming our attention, even if its prevalence is questionable. (A Google search of the term finds tons of articles on teen sexting; on the first page of results there was only one piece on a man whose wife was sexting someone else, but that’s the only non-teen related piece I saw on several pages.)
Maybe we’re more comfortable with adult sexuality, but many of us are skittish about teens as sexual beings. And of course many are concerned about the possible far reaching repercussions for teens of having sexy videos, semi-nude or nude pictures ”out there”. How will these images look to college admissions boards and potential employers?
Is the answer to block text messages? My mobile carrier, T-Mobile, does offer message blocking but I don’t see how this would help me if I was a texter but wanted to stop someone from sending me racy pictures. Message Blocking allows one to block one or all of the following types of messages: text, video, photos, IMs and emails. All of them! If I used message blocking, I couldn’t chose who to exchange texts with.
What does how we handle actual teen sex, as opposed to sexual photos and videos suggest on this issue? Although laws vary by state, in many states it is not a crime for older teens to have consensual heterosexual intercourse, unless one is older by a certain number of years. The permitted age range varies depending on the state. That means that in many cases teens could have consensual sex with no legal repercussions but could be charged with child pornography for sexting. In some states, conviction for possession of child pornography also requires that one be registered as a sex offender, for life.
How should we as a society handle sexting? What do you think of the legal approach of responding with felony child pornography charges? Presumably this response is meant to act as a deterrent to other would be teen sexters. But how well do various deterrence strategies work with adults? Many of our actions are not the most rational; this is a hallmark of teen life. For example, many teens believe their images will be shared but they still sext anyway. Consider who the victims of these sext crimes are. Or are these victimless crimes? Would you say that Jesse Logan was a victim? How about the teenagers in Pennsylvania? Are the three girls who sent the pictures perpetrators of a crime and the boys victims? How about if the person receiving the sext does not want it? Is that sexual harassment? What do you think?






I am a senior in high school and im writing a paper about why people not just teens should not sext. I have to have 3 main points and i am having a hard time coming with one more. Anybody have any ideas?
Posted by: JR | February 21, 2010 at 09:04 PM
Texting is a part of most people every day life. It could never be blocked. But what could happen is awarness. Somebody needs to go around to schools and tell them stories like this so they can understand the consequences of sending promiscuous texts to teenage boys. Teenage brains aren't fully developed yet to understand the long term consequences of their actions. These girls should know either way that doing this is not good. I also believe though that the receiver should know better then to send the text, video or picture to the entire school. If they knew stories like this they would understand the emotional impact of what could happen if they did. The whole "sexting" thing is ridiculous from both ends. When this ridiculous act leads to some bodys suicide then it just can't be ignored, drastic measures need to be taken.
Posted by: Sara | February 22, 2010 at 03:10 PM
of course knowing a teen involved in sexual issue is a big thing. We should be careful so as not to put our children under such condition.
Posted by: boarding101 | August 10, 2010 at 04:01 AM
The rise of technology is very alarming especially to our youth today. It is so sad to know that a simple use of cell phone caused lives and rise of suicidal. Bottom line here is that never share your nude photos or just don’t appear nude to videos or cameras to avoid such situations. Trust nobody!
Posted by: MRWED | September 24, 2010 at 04:22 AM
With today's problem of the consequences of "sexting", the parents and the school administration should start early in educating the kids on the negative effects of getting involve in this kind of fad. If there was a clear punishment towards the original person sending the "sexts" and the people who disseminates copies of them, then I'm sure the issue wouldn't be too extreme. Considering an activity like this as a crime to be punished might probably discourage teenagers to do "sexting" in the first place.
Posted by: Turning Winds Blog | January 31, 2011 at 09:47 PM
Teen sexting is not a charge if the person is not a adult handling the suggestive material, but it does make us all take a step back and look at the world of sex for the youth everbody wants to be a star , or dtarving for some kind of the wrong attention.
Posted by: perry | February 23, 2011 at 02:33 PM
Team sexting is not offense unless a adult is mingling witha minor , even though I don't suggest anymore send pictures over the internet , it is a form of foreplay for youth today, or attention grabbing.
Posted by: perry | March 08, 2011 at 03:48 PM
No judge who wants to be reelected would prosecute a teen girl to the fullest extent of the law for sending nude pictures of herself. Recently a seventy year old man who lives near me was convicted of molesting a ten year old. He got three months of house arrest and five years on the sex offender registry.
When a sixteen year old girl sleeps with an eighteen year old male, he's the only one who sees it. When she sends naked pictures of herself then the second the relationship is over those pictures wind up on reddit or viewnakedpicturesofmysluttyexgirlfriend.com where the guy down the street from me on house arrest is safe to view and download naked pictures of an underage girl. That, to me, is distribution of child pornography. Both the girl and her ex-sleezebag of a boyfriend should be charged. The internet has its ups and downs that we have to live with.
Posted by: Drew | March 25, 2011 at 03:18 PM