November 28, 2008

Can Television Get You Pregnant?

author_karen By Karen Sternheimer

While science has not yet allowed electronics to impregnate us, this question circulated in the news the day before the presidential election on November 3. Lost in the frenzy of the election, it was easy to miss reports of a new study in the journal Pediatrics that found a relationship between teen pregnancy and watching sexually laden television shows. 

News organizations like Time, CNN, MSNBC, and the Washington Post and others around the world covered this study, validating its clip_image002importance and suggesting that sex on television is a central cause of teen pregnancy. But is it really?

Let’s start with the study itself. The researchers studied twelve- to seventeen-year-olds over three years. They conducted a survey by phone, starting with 2,003 respondents; by the end of three years, the sample size had shrunk to 1,461. (In long-term studies it isn’t uncommon for researchers to lose track of participants who may move and/or change phone numbers.)

The authors document that those most likely to have remained in the study were younger, female, and had parents with less clip_image002[5]education. Among black teens in particular, those who remained were more likely to have been sexually active at the start of the study. By the end of the study, 91 teens, or fourteen percent of the remaining sample became pregnant or had gotten someone pregnant.

In addition to gathering information about sexual behavior, the survey asked teens how often they watched one of 23 predetermined television shows that the researchers determined had high levels of sexual content (including flirting, touching, kissing, talk about sex, implied sex, and depictions of actual intercourse).

The authors’ initial findings suggest that the most important factors associated with teen pregnancy are being black, female, exhibiting problem behavior, and stating an intention to have a child before the age of 22. Living in a two-parent family was negatively associated with teen pregnancy; in other words, these teens were significantly less likely to become pregnant or to impregnate someone. Television viewing on its own was not statistically significant

When the authors performed a multivariate analysis, or controlled for these other factors, television viewing became statistically significant—although the strongest predictors remained being black, female, not living in a two-parent household, and exhibiting problem behavior. Television viewing itself was actually negatively associated with pregnancy; the more television watched, the less likely a pregnancy would occur.

And yes, they found that watching the shows they deemed high in sexual content was statistically significant when controlling for the other factors, but it was less of a factor than those mentioned above. 

If you have taken statistics, you might remember the term p value, which means the probability of this finding being the result of chance or an actual relationship between the concepts we are studying.

Generally speaking, social scientists want to make sure that our findings are unlikely to be the result of chance. If we want to be 99.9 percent certain, we use a p-value of .001 or lower, 99 percent certain means our p-value must be no greater than .01, and to be 95 percent certain our p-value cannot exceed .05. If we are not at least 95 percent certain that our findings are not the result of chance, we typically will concede our results are not statistically significant.

Now back to sex and TV. According to the Pediatrics study, we can be 99 percent certain that being black and exhibiting problem behavior is linked with teen pregnancy, and 99.9 percent that being female and not living in a two-parent family is also linked with teen pregnancy. The p-value for these variables is about .01 or less.

When we look at the television p-values, they are higher, which means the strength of their significance is lower. Total television exposure, a factor that predicts lower pregnancy likelihood, has a p-value of .02, meaning we can be 98 percent certain of this relationship. Age also has a p-value of .02, indicating that getting older is also a predictor of pregnancy. 

And what of the smoking gun of sex on television, the finding that heard ‘round the world? It’s p-value is .03, the weakest of the statistically significant findings.

This does not mean these findings don’t matter, but the authors’ conclusion that the “results suggest that television may have a substantial role in the high clip_image002[7]rates of teenage pregnancy in the United States” is likely an overstatement. 

The authors do concede that they cannot make any causal conclusions here; correlation is not the same as causation. Yet their concluding suggestions focus on television: they ask industry leaders to modify content, encourage pediatricians to inquire more about their patients’ media use and suggest parents to watch television with teens more often.

While it is very possible that teens who are sexually active might be more drawn to sexual media content than their abstinent peers, there are a number of unexplored issues here. First is the racial/ethnic disparity. According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), in 2006 African American teens aged fifteen to nineteen had a birthrate of 63.7 per thousand, Latina teens 83.0 per thousand, Native American teens 54.7 per thousand, Asian American teens 16.7 per thousand and white teens 26.6 per thousand. Something is going on here, and it’s not just that the white and Asian American parents are watching television with their kids.

Teen pregnancy is highest in racial/ethnic groups that experience the highest levels of poverty. Yes, lower income people might also watch more television, but the central causal factor is not what teens see on TV. Lack of access to and information about birth control, lack of access to the educational and job opportunities that might be derailed by early pregnancy, as well as cultural factors come into play to explain teen pregnancy far better than what is on TV. For instance, a recent New Yorker article described how evangelical teens are actually more likely than other teens to be sexually active but less likely to use birth control. Sociologists have hypothesized that cultural attitudes condemning premarital sex might make these teens less likely to use birth control, which teens might interpret of proof of a plan to have sex rather than something that "just happened."

Teen birth rates are also much higher in the United States than they are in Europe, which has far more sexually explicit TV than we do here. But we have much higher poverty rates. If we truly want to reduce the number of teen pregnancies—and there are good reasons to try and do this—television is a tantalizing, but ultimately futile diversion. Studies like this make for great sound bites, but reducing teen pregnancy is far more complex than changing the channel.


TrackBack URL for this entry:

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Can Television Get You Pregnant?:


I completely agree with the last line of this post. Reducing teen pregnancy is far more complicated than we think. I think one of the most important things to do that many people overlook because it is uncomfortable is having conversations with teens about sex. I've recently come across the writings of Dr. Meg Meeker, a great source on how to talk to teens about sex. The most recent book I read is Your Kids at Risk: How Teen Sex Threatens Our Sons and Daughters. I highly recommend to anyone with teens.

Bottom line is that you can't stop teens from having sex because it's a natural characteristic of teenage sexual development. You can make it more dangerous by denying them information that could keep them safe when having sex. And you could go on a sexual programming witch hunt with absolutely no results, because exposure means nothing if someone has a well-developed sense of judgment.

Basically, this study feels more like intentional media-grabbing sensationalism than serious research.

Blogs are good for every one where we get lots of information for any topics nice job keep it up !!!

This article was interesting because I have some friends dealing with teen pregnancy's right now. It is very time demanding and stressful on them. In reality, there is no way of stopping pre-marital sex, it is part of growing up. I agree that the best solution is to have safe sex (condoms, birth control). I don't know if I believe the correlation with watching T.V. Every teen is different, wouldn't you think getting pregnant has more to do with how they were brought up?

I believe that teens have influence everywhere around them, so saying that what is on tv doesn't matter isn't necessarily a good conclusion because you want to reduce the amount they see. Evangelistic teens bring non-christian friends to church. I don't think saying evangelistic teens are more likely to have sex is quite the proper way to say it. I agree tv isn't the strongest influence, but it should still be considered as a factor in higher sexual activity.

I completely agree with Sternheimer's correlation between television and teen pregnancies. Television can impact the way human’s view the world and influence their ways of thinking, particularly teenagers. Entertainment news especially shows young celebrity teens pregnant, such as Jamie-Lynn Spears, (Britney Spears’ younger sister) being pregnant and acting happy and excited about it; making it seem as though being a pregnant teen is “a cool thing to do.” Yet, what most teens do not realize is that pregnant celebrity teens have more than enough resources and money to properly support a child, where as they most likely do not. It is important for society to remember though that stopping teens from engaging in sexual activity in highly unlikely and stopping television programs from advertising sex is even more highly unlikely. So instead of educating teens about abstinence or not educating them at all about sex, or hoping that television programs will stop making sexual references (because in time it will only get worse), schools as well as teen parents should offer more knowledge to them about the use of birth control, condoms, and other ways that can prevent pregnancy. I am not saying that this will stop teen pregnancies, but at least it will offer them more options to look at.

Excellent post and wonderful blog, I really like this type of interesting articles keep it up.

Fantastic post ever!

A thought provoking article and it wouldn't be easier to write on a sensitive issue. Great job!

Really nice work! Your article is unique, informative, interesting and is captivating attention of the readers. You have emphasized on a good point.

Really nice work! Your article is unique, informative, interesting and is captivating attention of the readers. You have emphasized on a good point, only because it's true that teen pregnancy is a lot higher. I went through this myself, being pregnant as a teen. I am still a teen, but I think this article reminded my of family, because that's what i'm reading about in my Sociology class. When you get pregnant, by television, being influenced. However, it may happen. It starts a family, unless you have an abortion. It's common sense not to though. I see it, as God giving you a blessing, he's given you the gift of a family,with unconditional love.
Amazing post.

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been posted. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.


Post a comment

Become a Fan

The Society Pages Community Blogs

Interested in Submitting a Guest Post?

If you're a sociology instructor or student and would like us to consider your guest post for please .

Norton Sociology Books

The Real World

Learn More

Terrible Magnificent Sociology

Learn More

You May Ask Yourself

Learn More

Essentials of Sociology

Learn More

Introduction to Sociology

Learn More

The Art and Science of Social Research

Learn More

The Family

Learn More

The Everyday Sociology Reader

Learn More

Race in America

Learn More


Learn More

« On the Job (Im)morality | Main | Sampson & Laub's Age-Graded Life-Course Theory of Crime »