Cultural Perspectives and Assumptions

By Sally Raskoff

We see the world through our own particular perspective and often assume that others share our views. Public events reveal these different perspectives, such as the conflict between Professor Henry Louis Gates and the police officer called to Dr. Gates’ home about an attempted break-in. Thoughts on this incident varied based on one’s experiences and cultural perspectives.

As I read thought about the differing views of the Gates incident, I was reminded of a summer trip we took in 2006 to the Little Bighorn Battlefield in Montana. This is the place commonly known as the site of Custer's last stand. We were on the trip with some people who were really into discussing the battle and the strategies that the U.S. Cavalry could have used to prevail. I wasn’t comfortable with that particular discussion for many reasons.

For those who don’t remember their history, this is the notable battle in which Native Americans (specifically, Lakota-Sioux, Cheyenne, and Arapaho) and the U.S. Cavalry (and their Native American scouts) ultimately clashed and both sides suffered tremendous loss of life. The twelve companies of the cavalry fighting this battle perished, including its leader, General Custer. My travel companions and many others feel that the cavalry underestimated the number of Native Americans or that their strategies were insufficient. Although the native peoples “won” this battle, they too suffered tremendous loss and they ultimately did not win the war.

The battle took place in June of 1876, and my visit was on the 130^th anniversary. The terrain there consists of beautiful rolling hills, and it is hard to see who or what is on the other side.

Once you get to the battlefield, the most obvious feature is the monument on top of Last Stand Hill. In 1879, three years after the battle, this location officially became a National Cemetery controlled by the War Department; in 1881, the twelve foot high granite monument was placed on top of Last Stand Hill.

Also at the top of Last Stand Hill is an enclosed area that delineates where Custer and many of his men fell. The fence around this area and the headstones invoke the common cultural markers of a cemetery.

If you move back from this hill, the view is quite grand (see photo below) and the granite marker and the cemetery fence are visible from many different angles.

The park map (see below) also shows this area as the focus of activity both historically and currently. Most of the tourists in this area were quiet and reverential, realizing that many people died at this location.

White headstones are placed wherever cavalry members fell. When you look over the expanse of the terrain, the white markers are obvious in contrast to the grass.

These two photos (above and below) were taken atop Last Stand Hill, looking south and east. The darker green grasses grow closer to the enclosed area mentioned above while the rest of the area is left to grow naturally.

If you’re at the top of this hill and you turn around to look to the north/east, you will see the image below – an iron sculpture of an Indian riding through the hills.

What you are seeing is the top of the Indian Memorial.

In 1940, the National Park Service took control of the cemetery and in 1991 it was renamed the Little Bighorn Battlefield National Monument and plans began for a memorial to the Native Americans who perished here. By 1997, the design was selected and construction began.

The memorial is on the other side of the hill from the Custer cemetery but one can still see the granite marker atop the hill. This new memorial consists of a round area with inscriptions on one side framed by the sculpture of the riders on the other side.

I found it to be quite beautiful and reverential, comparably as moving as the cemetery on the other side of the hill. However, my reverie in this space was interrupted by families traipsing through, children running and jumping up and down the steps in front of the sculpture. Tourists behaved appropriately on the other side of the hill, quieting their children and, if they were old enough, pointing out why. Few ventured to this side but many of those who did, in the time of my visit, seemed to forget they were still in a cemetery.

The quotes on the inside portion of the wall reminded people of what had happened there, yet I noticed that many of the tourists did not take the time to read them. (see photo below of two markers) They were walking through the space as if it were a rest area.

The design of this memorial was intended to serve many functions but also to serve as a ”weeping wound” in the earth.

As you leave Last Stand Hill and take the many trails throughout the rest of the park, there are some other interesting sociological aspects to notice.

Off the main trails, there are headstones. There are paved paths to the white headstones. In addition to those white headstones for the cavalry, there are dark red granite headstones for some of the Native Americans who died. Those that are relatively close to a trail also have a path to them, although they are not paved. The photo below shows two vistas with headstones, red granite on top, white on the bottom, from one of the trails.

I noticed immediately that the red headstones were quite difficult to see whereas the white markers were obvious, even from quite a distance. I was curious as to why the white headstones had paved paths while the red headstones had identifiable yet unpaved paths.

Once back at the Visitor Center, we attended a park ranger talk. I was fascinated to learn that all the rangers who do the talks about the park are themselves Native American and they tell the story that is not often told. They tell the story from the Native American point of view. Thus we learned more about how this was the culminating battle in which they were fighting to keep their way of life from these invaders.

They mentioned that the paths to the red granite headstones were not paved because that honored their culture while the white headstones were paved since that was in sync with that particular culture. Thus, when ceremonies were done to honor the dead, people used the paved paths to lay items on the white headstones and people also took the unpaved yet very clear paths to the red headstones. I also learned that the red headstones were placed in 1999.

We also learned some new facts about the battle. The conscripts in the cavalry at that time were mostly new immigrants, Italian and Irish, who did not necessarily speak English well or at all, thus the troops did not always understand the officers’ orders. This added to the problems that army was having in fighting this battle.

On the main building of the Visitor Center, the words of Black Elk are clearly placed (see photo below). I would have loved to ask everyone who passed by how they interpreted those words, but alas, I did not.

Visiting this site with acquaintances who were focused on calvary strategies challenged me. I used my sociological analytical skills to see as many sides of the situation as possible and to consider the impact of culture on its creation and on how people experience it as tourists and local residents.

I would encourage everyone to visit historical locations and use your sociological imagination to assess what you see. Don’t rely on your first impressions or assumptions. Instead, gather information about what you see so that you can compare the different sources and decide what makes sense to you. Consider alternative viewpoints, especially those that are contrary to your own.

Click here for further information about Little Bighorn.

Comments

[Heath Hauflaire]

Your comment about people's reaction to the different monuments makes me wonder about the intent of the designs for the different monuments. I wonder if the use of a traditional granite obelisk-type style of the Custer's side memorial along with traditional white granite markers may have had a more solemn effect on the people you observed versus the more modern conceptual and more subtle design of the Native American memorial. I don't know much about Native American culture, but perhaps, because of their spiritual beliefs they are less inclined to put their mark on nature as to co-exist within it, so the more subtle design, while not as solemn to the western cultural experience, may more align with their beliefs. I found the concept of the "weeping wound" on the earth very interesting.

[connor williams]

Your final comment is interesting to me- you admit you would have liked to stand below the the words on the main building at the memorial that read “Know the Power That is Peace” and ask every passerby what they make of the quote. To me, the quote tries to emphasize the fact that so much more can be done if people are at peace with each other and working together in harmony rather opposing each other endlessly. Within a time of peace, there is essentially, power in numbers. However, I would like to offer up an alternative interpretation as well. From the material culture artifacts mentioned in the text, it is apparent that the Native Americans placed a heavy emphasis on being harmonious with nature, living within it rather than apart from it. Possibly being at peace is merely the ability for one to act with nature rather than fight against it. Once that ability has been mastered, a person is more powerful because they do not try to fight that which uncontrollable. This may be too Daoist for a sociological blog- but I think the importance placed on nature in this particular article cannot be ignored and speaks clearly to the sociological, cultural and societal differences between the Native American and white American cultures.

[Edward Guinn]

I also found the design concept of the weeping wound very interesting. I think it is a living memorial to the suffering or ‘weeping’ of the Native American people whose culture was greatly harmed by this battle. It could also a place to celebrate and pray for their ancestors’ spirits. I hope to visit this national monument one day so I can decide for myself what makes sense.

[Lekeya Jackson]

This article was very interesting and I have learned at lot from it. I hope to visit this monument one day to see it myself.

[George Moore]

The article was very intersting and the concept of the weeping wound fascinating. I have learnt a lot from this. I like the concept that we see the world through our own perspective and assume that others share our viewpoint and it is not true. Anyway, great article.

[Jasmine Salazar]

The most recent historical place I visited was in Berlin, Germany. I stayed few hours in Charlie’s Checkpoint. I didn’t think much about the site, I just knew that there was a piece of the Berlin Wall still standing that was donated to remind the people of the old days. As a tourist, all I did was take lots of photos, not being really interested in the country’s history. Everything to me just seemed very nice and old, a bit boring though, like the textbooks. I stayed there for 6 days, 3 at the beginning of my arrival there, and 3 at the end. In my last 3 days, I really paid attention to my surrounds and I asked questions too. Like that, I was able to really enjoy the experience of visiting another country.

[Hyung Bae Kim]

This article gave me some thoughts on the countries in the world. So many countires are out there and have very interesting histrical facts. As the aritcle point out that desipite of a short history of U.S, United States have an amazing background of its history. " Once you get to the battlefield, the most obvious feature is the monument on top of Last Stand Hill. In 1879, three years after the battle, this location officially became a National Cemetery controlled by the War Department; in 1881, the twelve foot high granite monument was placed on top of Last Stand Hill" This quotes shows a one of a fun facts about the history.

[Gino Lee]

Professor PIH (soc 150)

I recently visited the Getty museum, I was surprised how beautiful it was. I really would not want to challenge what i saw at the Getty. It was a remarkable place. I would of payed attention to more detail, rather than skimming through things.

[George Moore]

This article showed that so many countries have interesting historical facts. The concept of the weeping wound was fascinating. I have not visited the Getty,but will one day do that to learn a lot.

[Amber Santos]

My first impressions or assumptions about it this article was that this place is very interesting. I have never been to these places but, I would ask what different things meant. Also, I would try to learn more about the history of the objects.

[Julio Rincones]

I found the piece very sad, how some members of society still do not see that we were the enemy. When she first spoke of the unpaved trails, I thought of disrespect to the native American people. I found it very interesting how they chose to have it unpaved and understand why. There is so much American History that I want to learn about and visit, the good, bad, and the ugly of it. Great piece, putting it in my bucket list of places to visit.