Past Meets Present: Education, Housing, and Segregation
Want to make some quick cash? $250 to be exact. Easy money. What would you do for that kind of money?
This proposition is completely legal. All you have to do is make one telephone call. (Operators are probably standing by!) In order to qualify, all you have to do is have the city and state, name of a school, name of a person, age or grade level of a child, a second address, know how long the person has lived there—and with whom. Add some information about how you know whether the person in question does not live in a particular home and $250 is yours.
Confused? Let me clarify: There are businesses that verify addresses of students and employees. Why would this be necessary? These businesses prevent or catch students from attending a school outside of their district (or employees from working in areas where they should not).
Do you believe that people would actually try to steal an education? Not for college or university but for kindergarteners? This kind of crime is known as educational theft.
One example of an educational thief is Kenny Williams-Bolar. Williams-Bolar is a single mother from Ohio who sent her daughters to a school in her father's neighborhood. Unfortunately, Williams-Bolar herself was not a resident of that school district. Williams-Bolar was charged with grand theft and received a conviction of two felony counts. She spent nine days in jail. At the time of her arrest, Williams-Bolivar was only 12 credit hours away from gaining her license as a teacher. With a felony count she would be unable to pursue teaching as a career. Fortunately for Williams-Bolar her charges were dropped to misdemeanors so she will be able to pursue teaching.
Another example of educational theft is the case of Tanya McDowell. McDowell was a homeless woman in Connecticut. News accounts indicate that at the time of the theft, McDowell was living in her van, moving between friends’ homes in Norwalk and Bridgeport, and a homeless shelter. McDowell used the address of her son's babysitter in Norwalk to enroll him into kindergarten. She pleaded guilty to larceny and drug sales and was given a 12 year prison sentence. (If like me you’re wondering where a homeless parent is supposed to send their child to school, the answer appears to be in the district of their last residence.)
Both McDowell and Williams-Bolar are African American. Is that by chance? Arguably, not. As Karen Sternheimer discussed in this post about the lingering legacy of segregation, institutional racism is difficult to see, but its effects continue to affect our lives decades after the law and public opinion have shifted. Think about it, as Matthew Desmond and Mustafa Emirbayer point out in Racial Domination, Racial Progress: The Sociology of Race in America, today more African Americans live in segregated neighborhoods than did at the end of the Civil War; most African Americans live in cities that are predominantly African American. As the well-off moved out of cities in the last century or so, we have seen a concentration of the poor and minorities left behind in decaying neighborhoods. Moving out of these ghettoes has never been as simple as having the desire (and money!) to do so. Minorities who want to move to a better school district faced a number or roadblocks including: denials of Federal Housing Administration loans, real estate agents purposely avoiding certain areas when showing available housing, redlining, and racial covenants, which legally prevented homeowners from selling their homes to members of races listed in the home’s title deed.
What is the relationship between where you live and the merit of your education? Schools in poor neighborhoods tend to experience teacher shortages and underperform on any number of measures due to inadequate resources. (To encourage more teachers in these areas, a number of incentives have been tried, including student loan forgiveness.)
This is the case because public schools are heavily funded by property tax revenues. Therefore, if those revenues are low—based on property values, low-income neighborhoods cannot generate high property tax revenues—there are limited funds to pay for the things associated with enhancing education such as textbooks, computers, and appealing teacher salaries. Conversely, parents who live in higher tax districts are paying to provide their children with access to the best public schools. Their tax dollars then, afford their children that education. Why don’t parents like McDowell and Williams-Bolar do the same? Both single mothers, there is every indication that neither one could afford to live in areas with better schools systems.
How segregated—or not—is your neighborhood? How good is the school district where you live? What do you notice about your neighborhood schools compared to those in some other areas? In your area, what are the schools like in predominantly white neighborhoods? And in predominantly minority neighborhoods? If you lived in a low-income neighborhood, would you feel like you should get the same kind of education like your peers in a more affluent area? And as a parent, what might you do to get your children the best education possible?
This reminds me of how in the past genders separated who got educated and who did not. The women stayed home cooking and cleaning; while the men got an education, because they were thought to better more intelligent. Education always seems to be segregated; when it should, but it's a result of the past.
Posted by: Faith Mahoney | May 08, 2012 at 04:35 PM
This reminds me of a friend of mine where something similar like this happened. He was attending school outside of his district when his actual home district caught wind of this and they contacted his parents. Come to find out that they used a fake address to get him enrolled at the school he was currently in. They ended up kicking him out of the school and I even think his parents got in trouble. I think that this was uncalled for because I think his parents were just trying to get him out of the inner city and into a good school district so he could get a better education, and also for him to stay out of trouble.
Posted by: Ryheem Stokes | May 08, 2012 at 06:38 PM
Because of how demented the world is nowadays I do, in fact, believe that people would resort to such a low point that they would steal education from kindergartners rather than from college students. Now we have charter schools and all that they do is pick out from raffles and so on and don't care about who needs it more - they'll even kick out some students who don't even care. The "No child left behind" is just to make the school look good. The only thing that matter to educators (or at least most) is the money, and whether or not someone needs to send their child to a school in a different district, or a charter school, is one of the simplest ways they can mess up the educational process for the children.
Posted by: Dani F. | May 08, 2012 at 07:01 PM
They shouldn't arrest people because they want to send their kids to school. Both women shouldn't of gotten arrested because they wanted to send their child to a good school. No one should be taken away from an education. I believe that if a parent wants their child to go to a certain school, then the school district shouldn't take that away from them. The parents should be able to choose the school that their child goes to.
Posted by: Justyne T | May 08, 2012 at 07:02 PM
Great write up!! I think people need to grow up and move past this whole racism thing. people need to learn how to either get along with a raceor just ignore them because there areway more hate crimes on people occuring these days because of race then what there should be. It shouldnt matter where a student gets there education as long as they get one. Student not going to school because there race is different than other kids is rediculas.
Posted by: payton white | May 11, 2012 at 02:23 PM
I think how students feel in the environment of school, the attitudes of their teachers, attitude of their principal, attitude of other students, and everything else in school influences how a child will act in school. So the school has to be built on certain principles to leave racial hate crimes in the past.
Posted by: Faith Mahoney | May 12, 2012 at 04:24 PM
This reminds me of how far are schools have really "Advanced" over the years. I say this because back when the schools were segregated African Americans were sent to different schools, that were more poor then the other schools, they didnt have asll the same stuff that was needed like books, nor did they have all the teachers. And even today it still remains just that.
Posted by: Tyler Rose | May 14, 2012 at 08:23 AM
I don't think these women were trying to "steal education" they were trying to give their kids a better education so that they would have a better chance of being successful. If i were them I would have done the same thing because I wouldn't want the best for my children too.
Posted by: ralyn allen | May 22, 2012 at 01:24 PM
would*
Posted by: ralyn allen | May 22, 2012 at 01:26 PM
I think that if a child wants to go to a certain shcool and have a certain education then they should should have every right to do choose what they want. The women should not have gotten arrested just becauase they wanted the best for there children.
Posted by: Kacy Vruggink | May 29, 2012 at 12:40 PM
I admire the valuable information you provide in your articles. Educational theft is awful but it sad to hear that parents are getting arrested for it.
Posted by: Christian College | June 05, 2012 at 12:02 AM