Keeping Order at Home
There is no place like home. But what makes a home? Some of you might say a home is a place that gives you a feeling of comfort, safety, and familiarity; it is a place where your heart belongs, and the self can thrive. It is a welcoming sanctuary where you find a treasure chest of living. But above all, home is where everything should be in order.
When we enter different homes with a sociological perspective, we can immediately experience a unique statement about the inhabitants’ tastes, lifestyle, and identity. At the same time, we can see how everything is put and kept in its place. Have you ever noticed how ordering things in the home might bring you a sense of wellbeing and comfort, but looking around a messy home can be overwhelming? The domestic space is, thus, a good place where we can study our relationship to objects and its connection with social order.
Most likely, we may store our stuff in the spaces where we most commonly use the objects. So, the rationale for keeping things at the places to which we think they belong might probably be more pragmatic than symbolic. However, putting things in places where they “just belong” are, according to Douglas, well arranged spatial manifestations of underlying rules and values.
A disruption of order at home relates, for example, to what Douglas views as “dirt;” where a thing in the wrong place, or too much stuff, violates norms, values and interests. Douglas brings up some examples by drawing our attention to “[…] bathroom equipment in the drawing room; clothing lying on chairs; out-door things in-doors” (1966, p. 37). Or imagine finding cutlery in your bedside table. While those things are not dirty in themselves, they may become “dirty” by placing them where they are out of context.
In this sense, each object belongs to a particular place, and the concept of “dirt” defies this place. So, by assigning things to their suitable areas, we also create a non-place; a location where things do not belong and become “dirty” or “a matter out of place.” Whether our things are put in or out of place, there are cultural rules which tell us which objects can be combined and placed with others and the anxiety, repulsion or disgust that arises if these rules are transgressed.
Most often, however, people may not reflect consciously on their stuff unless the objects are put out of context; unless we classify them as “dirty.” Just think of how quickly everything in your home can, at the turn of events, suddenly end up deliberately hidden behind closed doors. How quickly do you put away clutter that has been stashed in your living room when unexpected visitors arrive? How deliberately do you hide intimate objects from plain sight? A disruption usually prompts action, followed by an ad hoc spatial re-organization.
But where does the idea of a proper place for our stuff come from? Do we organize our home from an innate aesthetic sense or is our concept of order and “dirt” shaped by cultural values, symbolic meanings and social trends?
Pierre Bourdieu’s work could explain us how people maintain a sense of domestic order through the display of taste and distinction. When we select places for our stuff to rest, Bourdieu might say that we will place it according to our likes and dislikes. In doing so, we not only represent parts of our lifestyle. We simultaneously symbolize boundaries between purity and pollution, private and public, inside and outside at home.
Just as we put our material things within this complex system of classification and segregation, we may also see how domestic divisions play a role in the organization of our home. Structural factors, such as age, income, occupational stability, neighborhood and living conditions, as well as social change can make people feel more or less concerned with keeping things in order (more on housing insecurity). A sense of order at home is therefore reflected and recreated by a socially constructed, yet meaningful vision of the home as a place of belonging, safety, as well as of private and public expression.
Now, with that in mind, is the way we organize our stuff a matter of choice, obligation or structure? Take a look around you and see for yourself. Wherever you keep your things in (dis)order, you can witness individually meaningful, yet socially constructed phenomena at place. What gives you the feeling of home might therefore extend well beyond a sense of homeliness, and may well be a reification of social concepts, values, and norms. These inherent social rules do not stop at our doorstep. At home, we also try to re-create order by putting everything in place.
a good blog to know!
Posted by: snow rider 3d | June 02, 2023 at 12:30 AM
Coming from someone who is very OCD when it comes to my home and the way I like things in place, I can totally relate to this article. I have been to different homes and seen how other homes are unorganized, while this may work for them, it does not work for me. Everything has a place and is kept organized. This helps me to function better. This may not be how others do things but not everyone has the same style.
Posted by: Ashley Rodrigue | June 18, 2023 at 01:12 PM
I have been to a variety of houses and seen how other people keep their spaces disorganized; although this may work for some people, I have found that it does not work for me.
Posted by: roller baller | June 20, 2023 at 03:04 AM
The piece by Mayr makes me think about the value of good housekeeping habits and the function that order plays in producing a cozy and peaceful living environment.
Posted by: driving directions | July 13, 2023 at 01:04 AM
I can relate to this article. The I organize my room compared to some people are very different and some methods just don't work for me. A very minimal and decluttered room is what brings me comfort, whereas some people like a lot of color or a lot of artwork on their walls.
Posted by: graci fabiano | August 18, 2023 at 03:57 PM